Arturo injects some reality into NBA Draft night fantasies

I love objectively analyzing sports, but it has its downside too.  It basically takes all of the oxygen away fromone of the time honored traditions of fandom, what I will call the “season of stupid hopes”.  (The Ceremony of Innocence is Drowned as someone once wrote).

For instance, its June and, looking at things objectively, I already know the Bucks have at best a decent chance to make the playoffs, but  they have a very slim chance of advancing past the opening round, and they have absolutely ZERO chance of winning an NBA championship.  That’s kind of depressing, but its realistic.  And sobering.

Same goes with NBA draft night.  If you subjectively analyze the prospects through your blue and red NBA glasses, like every ESPN analyst does, then every tall skinny African American is potentially another Kevin Garnett, every three point ace reminds you of Ray Allen, every raw big man could be the next Andrew Bynum, and absolutely every tall white European with an outside shot is certain to be the next Dirk Nowitzki.  But, in most cases, it just isnt so.

Yet, in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary, we repeat the same fantastic exercise every June.  We willingly delude ourselves using absurd, largely physical comparisons.  Comparisons that have little basis in statistical reality.   For instance, remember when Kenny Fields was the next Marques Johnson, Bucks fans?  Because he was a 6’7” small forward from UCLA.  Or remember how Todd Day was going to be the next superstar?  (I’m not sure why we thought that)  How dumb do those notions seem now?

Here is the truth.  Arturo shows on his genius draft model over at the Wages of Wins Journal that in fact very few of the players chosen last night will have any positive impact at all.  At most 4 of them look capable of producing above average winning statistics, but almost 80% of them look as though they will be utterly incapable of making any significant impact on their new team’s fortunes (unless it is a negative impact).

That may be depressing, and it may render all the next day “Draft Report Cards” moot, and it may take all the fun out of sports, but its pretty truthful.

I’m all giddy about Henson, the Bucks choice, but the truth is, he won’t turn the Bucks around.  According to Arturo, he’s just on the border of being “draftable”, and Arturo forecasts his rookie statline as decent at best, and probably below average.  In short, Mr Henson aint gonna be Milwaukee’s new Lew Alcindor.  In fact, the only player in the Draft who has ANY shot at having a franchise changing impact is the top pick Anthony Davis.  After that, you’ve got a couple of possibly above average players (one of whom is second rounder Jae Crawford), then you have a handful of probably average players, and after that you’re left with pure junk.

Those are the ugly facts.

But the Bucks should be better, and that’s enough for me.

About these ads

Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “Arturo injects some reality into NBA Draft night fantasies”

  1. bballpants Says:

    we share being bucks fans in common. But i do not share your pessimism. I believe against all math, that a good team can beat good talent.

    I am not a huge fan of silas.

  2. Ty Willihnganz Says:

    Silas? Do you mean Skiles? You’re scaring me. We didn’t actually hire Silas did we??

    Actually I’m not pessimistic at all. I think the Bucks will be a better team. And I think they are beginning to make more sound personnel decisions (leave aside the whole Golden State trade). I just know they aren’t close to being an NBA Championship team, and that’s what they must be shooting for.

    Here’s what I think I know. For the time being, the Bucks will have to operate without any elite or even near elite players. That being the case, they have to get almost EVERY personnel decision right. Because if you don’t have elite players, and you want to be an elite team, you have no room for error. Elite players are so uberproductive, they can cover up holes. The Bucks don’t have any hole coverers, ergo they cannot afford any holes. (The Heat, by contrast, had huge holes in the middle and on their bench. That’s the beauty of having the best player in the NBA on your team, along with another elite player, and another sub-elite player. With all that production, you can afford to carry some deadwood. Not so in Milwaukee).

  3. Jack Dyl Says:

    No offense but you seem to be pretty bad with names (Jae CROWDER) I noticed this on your draft sheet

    • Ty Willihnganz Says:

      I’m HORRIBLE with names!!!

      Well, I’m sloppy, no one is really horrible with names… its carelessness and trying to do as much as I can in the little time that i have.

  4. Jerbil Says:

    Nice to have you back, Ty! (NBA-wise). Forgot how much you add.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers

%d bloggers like this: